Schmotzer Co-Sponsors Bill to Reform Charter School Payments

The state legislator promotes the bill as an immediate savings for taxpayers.

 (D-Pennsylvania's 22nd House District) is trying to make the most out of his brief time in office.

Schmotzer, a former Baldwin-Whitehall School Board member who lives in , will represent all of  and part of Whitehall in the state House of Representatives through the end of 2012, but he's hoping to help pass legislation that will live on into 2013 and beyond.

Schmotzer is welcoming a new charter and cyber charter school reform bill—introduced by Rep. Mike Fleck (R-Huntingdon/Blair/Mifflin counties)—while also laying out four principles that Schmotzer believes must be in any bill to reform those schools.

"It's only fair to taxpayers for all schools to play by the same rules," Schmotzer said in a news release, "especially at a time when public schools are still coping with last year's $1 billion in state education funding cuts, and local property taxpayers want to avoid another round of trickle-down tax hikes."

The new bill (H.B. 2364), which can be read in its entirety here, prevents charter school operators from using public school dollars to contract lobbyists, provides for an annual audit of charter schools, caps reimbursements to charter schools at the same level that school districts receive reimbursements from the state, and more.

Watch a press conference regarding the bill, featuring Fleck, here.

"Charter and cyber charter are public schools, and they're here to stay," Fleck said during the conference. "However, I think it's time we have a thorough examination of how they operate. Charters are a different model of public education—no doubt. Nevertheless, we simply cannot hold them to an entirely different standard of accountability.

"They are not the 'sacred cow.'"

Said Schmotzer in a release, "These reforms should take effect starting with the 2012-13 school year, not be delayed a year as some Republicans are calling for. We can provide this relief immediately to school districts and their taxpayers. These reforms would provide at least $45.8 million in savings for the coming school year and probably much more than that.

"In addition to the direct fiscal reforms, I am pleased the bill keeps local control over charter school approval, unlike competing legislation that would strip that authority from locally elected boards and place it in the hands of bureaucrats in Harrisburg."

Schmotzer said that any bill to reform the financing of charter and cyber charter schools should address these four key areas, according to a release:

  • Limiting unassigned fund balances for charter and cyber charter schools consistent with the limits already in effect for traditional public schools. In 2010, the auditor general reported that charter schools had $108 million in reserve funds. Nearly half of charter schools had a cumulative reserve fund balance above traditional public schools' limit of 12 percent of their annual spending. The charter school balances ranged as high as 95 percent.
  • Removing the "double dip" for pension costs by charter and cyber charter schools. Presently, a school district's cost for retirement expenditures is not subtracted from expenditures in the tuition calculation that determines funding for charters. This sets up a "double dip" since state law guarantees charter schools reimbursement for their retirement costs. The Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials estimates that between 2011-12 and 2016-17, eliminating the "double dip" would save school districts $510 million, including $45.8 million in savings for 2012-13.
  • Limiting the amount of special education funding that a charter or cyber charter school receives per student to its school district's total per-pupil spending for special education services. The state funding formula's 16-percent cap on school district special education population does not apply to charter schools. An official of Bensalem High School in Bucks County testified last year that this results in paying $3,425 more per charter school special education student than Bensalem is paying for its own special education students.
  • Requiring year-end audits by the state Department of Education to determine the actual costs of education services of charter and cyber charter schools, followed by an annual year-end final reconciliation process of tuition payments from school districts against those actual costs. Any overpayments would be returned to the charter schools' school districts. In the 2010-11 school year, non-special education tuition rates per student ranged from $4,478 to $16,915.

Follow the Baldwin-Whitehall Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Sign up for the daily Baldwin-Whitehall newsletter.

Jim B. July 05, 2012 at 07:09 PM
"Ta Da" ----- ladies and gentlemen, we have the Marty Schmotzer headline of the week. You said it when you said "brief time in office". Thank you God. Does anyone really take this guy seriously? Really? This guy has no business being in this office. Counting down the days until he is gone, gone gone. Wonder who is holding his seat on the school board until he gets back? I have a guess.
Billee July 05, 2012 at 07:28 PM
Thank you for your continued support and practice of eliminating waste. However I don't understand why charter schools were not held to the same standards of accountability to begin with? Then again maybe some ignorance is bliss!
cc July 05, 2012 at 07:52 PM
I can't wait till I don't have to hear Schmotzer name anymore. School Districts only turn 80% of the money that comes from taxes, state and federal to Charter and Cyber Schools per student and they get to keep 20% of the money.
bd July 05, 2012 at 08:03 PM
The Patch's weekly Martin Schmotzer article. What a guy. I can't wait until his time is up. But wait, a little bird tells me that Marty might be the Democratic Party pick to run against Raja for Pippy's Senate seat. How wonderful that would be. We could go on and on with Patch Schmotzer articles for several more years. Isn't it funny that only the Patch runs these stuff?
Tom C. July 05, 2012 at 09:18 PM
You, me and countless others feel the same way my friend!
Tom C. July 05, 2012 at 09:21 PM
What, the democrats won't rest until Marty is in there somewhere, even if he has no qualifications and especially when NO ONE wants him in any office representing them? Wonder who he owes favors to who wants to collect on them and that is why they would be pushing for him. Why would anyone consider putting this man into office after what he did when he worked for the County? Why? And, because my comment will be censored if I write it .... if you do not know what Marty Schmotzer did several years back while employed by the County of Allegheny .... just google his name. You may need to google his correct birth name: Martin Leopold Schmotzer. Will you be amazed at what you find. Have a nice day.
JustMe July 05, 2012 at 10:12 PM
cc and Tom C, Can I join the club that we never have to see Schmotzer name again, lol
JustMe July 05, 2012 at 10:15 PM
bd totally agree with you. I don't want to see his name every again and the last I heard they were still undecided on filling that position. Yes, I just think Robert at the Patch loves to get us fired up on Schmotzer. No offence Robert.
JustMe July 05, 2012 at 10:18 PM
Tom everyone knows what he did but because he paid the money back were suppose to forget, I don't think so. Couldn't stand him on the school board and if he doesn't get Pippy's seat, wonder who is going to leave the school board so he can be placed back on. Maybe we can ship him off to Fantasy Island so he can be the ruler of his own domain.
Ted D. Bear July 06, 2012 at 02:15 AM
I have an idea! Let's make Marty feel important and put him in charge of scooping up all the kitty cats in Baldwin Township and spaying or neutering them. I think that should keep him busy and make him feel oh so important. Actually, I am surprised that he hasn't put his nose into that business and introduced a bill in the PA Senate regarding kitty cats. Oooops, did I scoop (no pun intended) the Patch on this breaking Marty headline/story! Anyone see my movie yet?
Billee July 06, 2012 at 02:42 PM
They already have No Kill laws and shelters for animals - don't they? Maybe they should switch them to Safe Haven Paws with no prosecution to the owner after dump off of the unwanted creature occurs... Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 I guess all the unwanted babies could be considered mercy killings! Poor animals they have to suffer with human stupidity!
cc July 06, 2012 at 04:24 PM
Ted love the idea of Marty being in charge of cleaning up after the cats and have wondered myself why he didn't step in on this matter. In fact he represents Baldwin Township so he should be out there cleaning up after the cats, being in charge of TRN. Marty also should of stepped in when Randy Balzer killed the two cats and left them laying at the bottom of his swimming pool. I did call his office on this when I reported him to Animal Friends, Baldwin Township, Humane Society. All of these places called me back but thinking on this, never did get a call back from Marty office as his secretary or who ever was answering the phone that day said I would receive one.
cc July 06, 2012 at 04:31 PM
Billie we are not talking about Abortions again on this feed. Ask Robert to start a feed or why don't you write an article on this matter so that people can talk about it. This article is on cats that people dump in the streets when they don't want the responsibility of taking care of them.
bd July 07, 2012 at 05:00 PM
JustMe - I agree with you with a little different twist. I think Mr. Healy writes articles about Schmotzer because he knows that there will be a lot of hits on the website since so many dislike the guy. I do have a question for Mr. Healy, however. Mr. Healy - Don't Kortz and Readshaw co-sponsor any legislation? I seem to recall that many of the bills that crawl their way through the plegislative process pick up dozens of sponsors and co-sponsors. Is Marty Schmotzer the ONLY local politican to co-sponsor legislation? Do you have a direct line to Kortz, Readshaw, Costa, etc. like you seem to have with the 22nd district representative?
Robert Edward Healy, III July 07, 2012 at 06:20 PM
Hi, bd. As a state representative for Baldwin Township and part of Whitehall Borough, Schmotzer's activities are newsworthy for this website. If his office issues a news release about his activity, we will almost always run it. We publish similar news for B-W's other reps.
bd July 07, 2012 at 06:32 PM
Thanks Mr. Healy. That answers my question. Marty Schmotzer is promoting himself and issues press releases that the Patch publishes. I simply find it interesting that other media outlets do not find his self-promotions newsworthy. On a better subject - are you planning to do any article on the B-17 Superfortress that has been flying out of the County airport? That thing is huge.
Tom Barchfeld July 07, 2012 at 11:09 PM
Just goes to show you that this "Representative" will cut something that will improve education for children. Is this not the same person who stole $50,000 from his County government office to pay off a $15,000 gambling debt to his bookie? And the Democratic Party endorsed him. And the Democratic voters voted him in! How dumb can you be to vote a man like this into office with such a complete lack of character and judgement!!
Bob B. July 08, 2012 at 01:57 AM
Tom - I am a resident of Baldwin Township and it is embarrassing that this person is our representative even for this short period of time. I, for one, would not and did not vote for him. Yes, he is the one who did this and came out (in a way) smelling like a rose. He changed his name (middle name from Leopold to Michael) to get on the ballot I believe. He was on our school board several times along with his brother. He has no business handling our school district or tax money PERIOD. If you have read or know of the several families that trade favors to keep each other in some type of political power be it on the school board or as a state rep or a job as a created job of dean of students at our high school you know who the players are. Thankfully, we will not have to state that Martin Schmotzer is our state rep for too much longer. We, as taxpayers, will insist that a complete audit is done after his time is up. In the meantime, be sure to keep reading this patch because there is sure to be a Marty Schmotzer headline at least once a week.
NOTIME4THIS July 12, 2012 at 10:55 PM
Jon Wain July 14, 2012 at 08:39 PM
is this directed to the math teachers of baldwin whitehall.after all isn't it the math that got him into hot water in the first place? it's like oj preaching self control.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something