Politics & Government

Legislators React to Corbett's New State Budget

The governor released his 2012-13 budget proposal on Tuesday.

Gov. Tom Corbett released his 2012-13 state budget on Tuesday, immediately drawing either applause or gnashing of teeth depending on which side of the aisle certain legislators sit.

The governor discussed the $27.14-billion budget proposal, a budget that would keep spending in line with a 2011-12 budget that slashed a billion dollars from public education and welfare programs. However, public universities such as the University of Pittsburgh and Penn State University face even larger reductions in funding from the state in this year's budget.

Corbett's budget does not include any tax or fee increases but also does not address transportation issues that include crumbling infrastructure and mass transit-funding problems.

Find out what's happening in Baldwin-Whitehallwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Corbett, a Republican who was elected in 2010, is unlikely to have much trouble pushing his budget through both Republican-controlled chambers of the Pennsylvania General Assembly. However, Democrats said that they would challenge the governor's budget, which they say continues the cuts that Corbett's administration began last year.

 

Find out what's happening in Baldwin-Whitehallwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

 (including parts of )

Kortz called the budget disappointing and said that the governor is once again taking a "metaphorical sledgehammer" to education.

"The equity funding formula is still cut," Kortz said, "and that is putting poorer school districts at a severe disadvantage.

"This year's proposal further deprives Pennsylvania students by cutting higher education, guaranteeing more tuition hikes and putting college out of reach for many of our hard-working, middle-class families."

Kortz added that the budget does not close tax loopholes and puts a burden on working families.

"We're looking at a state budget designed to inflict more pain on our taxpayers," he said. "Gov. Corbett did not close off any of the tax loopholes that exist. Yet, he is phasing out the Capital Stock and Franchise Tax.

"This plan is completely structured for business and hurts the people of Pennsylvania."

 

 (including all of )

Fontana said that the new budget is just more of the same from the Corbett administration, which he called "misguided and out of touch."

"Less than a week after we celebrated Groundhog Day, Pennsylvanians had a 'Groundhog Day' moment of another kind as Gov. Corbett outlined his 2012-13 state budget," Fontana said. "Apparently, the governor wants a repeat of last year's budget, which means more painful cuts, no direct job creation funding and no concern for ensuring that wealthy corporations pay their fair share."

Fontana said that the budget fails to close tax loopholes and likely will force school districts to raise taxes on property owners.

"Although there will be no state tax increases, school districts will once again be forced to slash programs and lay off more educators," he said. "This, essentially, will force school districts to make up the differences through property tax hikes."

 

Smith said that he is concerned about not properly investing in higher education, which he thinks is crucial to attracting young people to the state and retaining them.

"After last year's cuts to investment in early childhood education through higher education, this budget is full of more of the same," Smith said, "slashing deeper into our public education system."

Smith said that he wants to work with both parties to find "practical solutions" to preserve key investment areas. He said that he hopes to find common ground so that the middle class is not hurt by the budget decisions.

"I have long supported cost-saving reforms like reducing the size of the legislature and recognize the need to cut waste and reduce spending in a thoughtful and responsible way," he said. "I was hopeful that the governor's budget would reflect a thoughtful, middle-of-the-road approach that reduced spending in certain areas while maintaining investment in areas crucial to our success, such as community colleges and early childhood education."

 

Mustio said that he expects there to be much debate on the budget because of declining revenues in a time of trying to keep expenses the same.

"As a member of the Appropriations Committee, we will have hearings to dissect the proposed budget in great detail," Mustio said. "The challenges will be similar to last year. Those (challenges) are declining revenues and increasing expenses."

Mustio added that there needs to be a solution to fund transportation needs across the state.

However, the governor previously said that any solution should be debated outside of normal budget negotiations.

"In addition to the budget, it is critical that we address our transportation infrastructure," Mustio said.

 

Kotik said that he is still reviewing the budget but has similar complaints as the ones that he had with last year's spending plan.

"It's another disaster," Kotik said. "It's like Robin Hood in reverse. It takes from the groups least able to help themselves and uses the Department of Welfare as a whipping boy.

"It's just a bad budget all the way around."

Kotik questioned why there are major reductions to the state's tourism budget that would seem to be a major revenue source for the commonwealth.

Ultimately, Kotik doubted that there is much that Democrats can do to stop the current proposal from passing.

"They have it in their agenda, and they're going to ram it through," he said of state Republicans. "They're going to have to go with their governor."

 

State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-12th District

Metcalfe called the new budget "$1 billion short in overdue welfare spending cuts" and said that legislators must examine each state agency's "obese budgets," specifically public welfare's.

"The governor needs to exchange his butter knife for a meat cleaver and cut even more wasteful and excessive welfare spending," Metcalfe said.

Metcalfe said that reducing the welfare budget by 10 percent would save taxpayers more than $1 billion.

"The Legislature has already taken the first steps to facilitate policies to crack down on fraud in the system and end the 'close your eyes and authorize' policies of the Department of Public Welfare," he said. "The way to grow our economy is not on the backs of taxpayers but through reducing the taxpayers' burden."

 

State Rep. Mike Turzai, R-28th District

Turzai said that the dire predictions from last year never came to be and added that the 2012-13 budget proposes a small increase to basic education.

"Let's be honest," he said. "The days of endless spending are definitely over, but we are still climbing out of the mess created by the previous administration, where spending increased about 40 percent and inflation grew only 21 percent.

"We have brought fiscal discipline to the table."

Although Turzai, the House Majority Leader, acknowledged that the budget "limits the growth" in welfare spending, he pointed to money allocated for 115 new state police cadets.

"For the first time, in many years, we are living within our revenues," Turzai said. "This proposal is just the beginning, but it sets a tone: no tax increases, no reckless borrowing, and responsible priorities."

 

State Rep. Frank Dermody, D-33rd District

Dermody, the House Democratic Leader, said that the proposed 2012-13 state budget proposal is "Year 2 of the Corbett Property Tax Hike Agenda."

"This is a budget, like last year, that passes millions of dollars in costs on to the local governments and school districts," Dermody said. "Those costs are piled on top of the costs that were shifted in that direction in the last budget.

"Make no mistake about it: This is not a no-tax-increase budget."

Dermody said that expenses have been shifted to middle-class homeowners and senior citizens because cuts to public schools in 2011-12 resulted in property tax hikes in school districts across the state.

"Once again, we are getting a budget that cuts education and does little to address the job crisis in Pennsylvania," Dermody said on the House floor. "Despite the (Corbett) administration's assurances, we still have not seen a comprehensive plan to address the transportation funding gap."

Neuman lamented the "very generic" terms in which the governor spoke.

"It was hard to tell what his goals are for the budget," Neuman said.

Neuman said that Corbett's budget address seemed to hint at further cuts in higher education and that questions loom about how public-school funding will be handled—a major concern for Neuman.

"The main thing we need to focus on is that the money going toward our schools goes toward educating our students," Neuman said. "Funding our schools, and at the same time, lessening the burden of property taxes on our residents in Washington County should be a priority."

 

 and state Rep. John Maher, R-40th District, did not return calls for comment.

 

Click here for a summary from the Education Policy and Leadership Center of Corbett's proposed budget.

 

This article originally appeared on the .

 ---

Follow the Baldwin-Whitehall Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Sign up for the .


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here