patching...
Update: Receive Baldwin and Whitehall news in your inbox by subscribing to our daily newsletter ... »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

'Pay to Play,' Tax Raise, Staff Cuts All on the Table for 2012-13 B-W Budget

Required reading for district residents.

 

Tax Raise, Budget 'Shortfall'

Faced with an over $1.3-million budget shortfall for the 2012-13 school year despite a recommended property tax raise of 1.08 mills, the Baldwin-Whitehall School Board is considering a bevy of options to both bridge that budget gap and prevent that tax hike.

Among the options being considered in the B-W School District are staff reductions, advertising on school buses, fees to use school buses and a "pay to play" system for middle- and high-school sports and other extracurricular activities.

Although it hasn't raised district property taxes since a 1.50-mill increase in 2006-07 to help pay for renovations to Baldwin High School, the B-W School Board is almost certain to raise taxes for 2012-13. The expected increase is due to variables like reductions in funding at the state and federal level and large increases in expenses related to employee benefits, such as a 43-percent jump in employer contribution to the Public School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS).

"We most likely will raise taxes," B-W School Board President John B. Schmotzer said at a special budget meeting on Wednesday night. "To what extent is not known at this point."

Schmotzer expressed a strong desire to tax district residents less than the 1.08-mill increase recommended by district administrators, but doing so would cause even more money needing to be raised or saved to make up for the district's $1,364,228 shortfall.

William D. McKain, B-W's assistant to the superintendent for finance and operations, said that not raising taxes at all would equate to a shortfall approaching $2.8 million, as 1 mill in Baldwin-Whitehall equates to about $1.4 million.

The B-W School District's 2011-12 millage rate is 23.40 mills, or $2,340 per year for anyone with a property valued at $100,000 (land and building value combined). (Click here to calculate your individual taxes.)

Property reassessments for 2013 will not affect Baldwin-Whitehall until its 2013-14 school year budget. 

'Pay to Play,' Ads on Buses, Fees to Use Buses

In lieu of cutting spending or raising taxes even higher to solve the district's budget shortfall, Schmotzer and his colleagues on the school board are considering ways to increase district revenue, such as selling advertising to be placed on district buses, charging for district bus service and requiring students' families to pay fees to participate in extracurricular activities like sports.

"I have mixed emotions for this (paying for activities)," board member Nancy Lee Crowder said, acknowledging that extracurricular activities are part of students' educational experiences but also that times are tough economically for public schools.

Crowder said that her sister's school district charges students $75 each to participate in interscholastic athletics. Crowder finds logic in that system, saying that she doesn't see why in-school sports organizations should be treated much differently than out-of-school sports organizations, which do require athletes to pay fees.

Fellow board member Ray Rosing is in favor of a pay-to-play system if it means preventing activities from being dropped in order to save costs. 

"I'd go with charging for sports rather than cutting anything," Rosing said. He also said that $75 is a small price to pay for those students who end up earning an athletic scholarship to pay for some or all of college.

Schmotzer said that the school board should protect the district's low-income families who could not afford a pay-to-play price. He said that he would never prevent, "even out of (his) own pocket," a low-income student from participating. 

Board member Larry Pantuso said that he could tolerate reductions in the staffing of and spending on extracurricular activities but that he would not support specific eliminations of student opportunities.

"That's where you teach kids to work together, how to depend on each other," Pantuso said, adding that it's "(too) easy to balance a budget with scissors" and that it's the school board's job to maintain functions instead of cutting them.

Fellow board member George L. Pry said that he could support the cutting of some low-participation activities but did not mention any activities specifically.

"Some of these are nice activities, but are we everything to everybody?" Pry asked. "I don't know that."

Added board member Kevin J. Fischer, "We've put if off—pay to play. It is something that needs to be looked at. It is a sign of the times.

"The free ride—for all intents and purposes—is coming to an end."

Speaking of rides, Fischer said that he would consider charging students fees to use district transportation if it meant saving district programs from being cut and/or preventing a high tax increase.

He reminded those at Wednesday's meeting that Pennsylvania law does not require school districts to provide transportation. However, he recognized the importance of student transportation in Baldwin-Whitehall.

Staff Reductions, Four-Day Summer Workweek, Technology Slash

Put in front of the school board on Wednesday night by Dr. Randal A. Lutz, the district's new superintendent starting on July 1, were many options to reduce district spending by hiring fewer staff.

For example, Lutz suggested eliminating at least one nurse in the district, saying that B-W employs the equivalent of five full-time nurses right now when only three are required under state law that mandates one nurse per every 1,500 students. (The B-W School District has approximately 4,200 students.)

Crowder said that she prefers to have at least one nurse present in each of the district's five active school buildings, but Lutz said that nurses could rotate to different buildings as necessary and that office workers could help students with minor medical issues like requiring bandages.

Crowder and Pantuso said that there are enough students in Baldwin-Whitehall with special medical needs, however, to make them feel uncomfortable with less nurses.

"I wouldn't want an office worker tending to those kids' needs," Crowder said.

Lutz said that calling 911 is always an option.

Fischer supported Lutz's idea, saying, "When I went to school, nurses were far and few. I believe that we have to trim. We would be foolish not to take advantage of this."

Responded Pantuso, "It's easy to say unless it's your kid."

Of the seven board members who were present on Wednesday—Diana Kazour and Nancy Sciulli DiNardo were absent—only Crowder, Pantuso and Tracy Macek were opposed to eliminating at least one nurse, meaning that Lutz's idea will be put in front of the board for an official vote at a later time.

Similarly, Lutz recommended removing one social worker from district employment, which was again supported by Fischer, who said that the board should trust its administrative experts when it comes to determining how much staff is needed to educate the district's students.

"I'm not saying carte blanche," Fischer said. "I'd like to have one (social worker) for everybody, but that is not feasible. So, where do we meet that happy line? You (administrators) tell me. You're here day to day."

Lutz also recommended the elimination of two half-time encore teachers, an unspecified reduction in the number of "super"-substitute teachers and not filling the district vacancy of a middle- and high-school library secretary who recently retired.

No board members objected to those recommendations.

Lutz recommended a four-day summer workweek in the district, as well, requiring employees to show for four 10-hour days per summer week instead of five eight-hour ones.

McKain said that doing so would save on utility costs.

McKain recommended a sizable cut to the district's technology spending, moving it from $299,950 to $149,950 in one year as a way of reassessing how much new technology that the district truly needs.

Schmotzer agreed wholeheartedly and said that he would support the district's technology budget going even further down.

"Let's sit back and take a look at what we have," Schmotzer said. "I'm not just going to replace a computer to replace a computer—because it's 4 years old—if it's still functioning."

What About the Uncommitted Money?

The Baldwin-Whitehall School District has $4,807,632 in unassigned funds at the moment, according to McKain, but it is not considering using those funds to balance its 2012-13 budget.

Instead, McKain has recommended that one-third of the district's $2.8-million benefit stabilization fund—that's $933,333—be used. If so, the district would largely cut into the $1.3-million budget shortfall that it faces for next school year (including the tax increase of 1.08 mills).

McKain called the benefit stabilization money, which is separate from the district's unassigned funds, "a rainy day fund." The school board has built that fund up over the years to help cover shifting expenses like health care.

"We're saying it's raining," McKain quipped, "so we'd like to take a third of it out."

Added Pry, "I have no problem using it. To me, this is a savings account."

And Fischer, "We're using it for the purpose that we put it aside for."

But Baldwin-Whitehall's Business Manager William McNamee did express some caution.

"We have to be wary of one-time uses of our fund balance," McNamee said, pointing to uncertainty among health care providers, such as Highmark and UPMC. "It looks good, but where are we going to be at next year?"

McKain also said that he is recommending that the school board not spend $677,200 for a Baldwin High Stadium hillside renovation project that was budgeted for this school year so as to have that money available in 2012-13.

McKain's recommendations will be considered before any budget is approved and any related millage rate is determined.

Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan

After Wednesday's meeting had moved past the three-hour mark, the board decided to postpone its discussion about a five-year capital improvement plan for the district. That discussion may occur during a board meeting in May.

We know that you're thinking about something. Share your thoughts with your neighbors in the comments section below.

 ---

Follow the Baldwin-Whitehall Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Sign up for the daily Baldwin-Whitehall newsletter.

Related Topics: Baldwin Borough, Baldwin High School, Baldwin Township, Baldwin-Whitehall School Board, Baldwin-Whitehall School District Office, Diana Kazour, George L. Pry, Highmark, J.E. Harrison Middle School, and John B. Schmotzer

Jean Smith

7:30 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

What we need is for our teacher to pay for their own retirement find. My employer quit putting money in our pensions 8 years ago and if I wanted to continue to watch mine grow, I had to start paying it on my own. Lot of companies do that now and Baldwin School District shouldn't be any different. Times have changed and if you want a pension, put your own money in it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paula Lim

8:15 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

If you keep hacking away at our teachers, we will stop being being able to attract the best and the brightest to that profession and to our our district. Our free fall in the state rankings will continue, people will choose other districts to move to and we will be a shadow or our former selves. We are punishing the wrong sector of state employees.

Jill

8:55 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

I am sickened to hear they want to eliminate school nurses. But have no problem spending 667,000 on a hillside reconstruction. As a parent who has a child with food allergies and asthma, I want a school nurse there if my child were to be in anaphalactic shock or having an asthma attack. An untrained secretary won't help and 911 might be to late. I thought the school board was supposed to be looking out for the best interest of the kids in the district. I understand that the state mandate is only one nurse per 1,500 kids. But that is just plan ridiculous. There has to be some thing else to cut not the jobs of the school nurses. Besides that when will the secretaries get their jobs done? Especially in the elementary levels? Do you know how busy those nurses are?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

3:50 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Jill, I agree with you there. There should be a nurse at every school and we don't need secretaries give our students the required meds they have to take in the day. Our school board doesn't look out for our students, they are too busy making video's, fixing hillsides and remodeling schools for students we don't have nor can't see coming to our school in the near future.

Gma

9:13 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

I work for one of the "big" medical insurance companies, and I also pay for my own pension AND medical insurance. Times definitely have changed, I agree that our teachers need to pay for their own pension and medical insurance, this is not a punishment, its a fact. A 43% jump in employer contributions... Come on, this has to stop. As was stated, we are falling in the state rankings, have we really attracted the best and brightest?

Reply

Baldwin Mom

10:46 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

I think it is a bad decision for the school board to even consider cutting sports at all and if "pay to play" is in fact enacted, there should be scholarships available to low income students. I am a licensed counselor and live in the district and feel to cut availability to physical activity for low income kids would be detrimental as one school board member pointed out due to the possibility of scholarships for those children due to prolonged sports participation. Cutting Social workers and nurses is also a very bad idea as the schools will then increase their probability of law suits related to not providing the necessary supports to the students who need them as mandated in their IEP. The cost may seem frivolous now, but will save the district money in the long run!

Reply

Michael Dobs

11:15 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

First off being the only school who does not assist in retirement would make no sence... We would get bad teachers and your teachers that just want a job. 'pay to play' has worked in many districts out side of this area. Those were middle and upper class districts that were not financially responsible. We are a middle and lower class district with a few upper class areas that was not wise... I said the past years when the taxes were cut down (just to keep those on the board on the board... Thanks for screw$!@ us and the current board guys) this was gunna catch up to us. I believe we need to have a free pay to play for the kids who can't afford it. But most of the schools athletes fit into this category.. So what's this going to save in the long run. And to say that it's a small amount to pay for a scholarship. Baldwin athletics are not that great, they have lots of average coaches, which produce mostly average athletes so 98% of them will not get scholarship money.

Reply

Michael Dobs

11:21 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

If that's the case lets charge extra money for kids to take AP classes because they are more likley to end up with scholarships. And if your lumping all extra activities together for academic standards then everybody should pay... Band, musical, French club, newspaper... They have school sponsors who get paid. I think it's time for the board to take a serious look in the mirror and start talking with Brentwood about a merger!!

Reply

Cathy

11:58 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012

If you voted for Corbett, quit your bitching.

Reply

Cathy

1:45 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

If BW merged with Brentwood, you would see many people moving out of the school district - including me! So sick of the low income people getting EVERYTHING for free.....school lunches, breakfast, and now sports fees paid. Let them get out there and do some fundraising to pay for their sports! Tired of giving them the free ride! Earn your keep!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

4:05 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Cathy it isn't just the low income people that get everything for free in the school district. I can name a few families that live in 350,000 homes in Whitehall who's kids get free lunches. Why do they get free lunches is because their parents lost their high paying jobs due to our jobs being sent overseas. I know when I was in high school, our clubs, sports and everyone raised their own money though fundraisers. You don't see many of them anymore in this school district as you do in other schools around here.

Lou Rainaldi Jr.

2:02 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

I would really like to hear more about "expenses related to employee benefits, such as a 43-percent jump in employer contribution to the Public School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS)".
Like Kevin Fischer said "We've put if off—pay to play. It is something that needs to be looked at. It is a sign of the times.
"The free ride—for all intents and purposes—is coming to an end."

This is all the way around, our school district scores where low and that comes back to the staff. I love the teachers my kids have, but I can't support an increase for employer paid retirement when that is not what the tax payers get. We have to pay for our medical and retirement.

The hillside project at the high school should be stopped. Any talk of charging for bus transportation to/from school is a joke in my opinion. The same with the nurses and social worker.

These board members where just voted in, let's see if they are up to the challenge, but we tax payers must stay involved.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NB

2:24 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

Charge a fee for students who park at the high school. The district has to provide a seat for them on the bus and they are not using it. So pay to park at the BHS.

CHM

2:22 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Cutting back on nurses is ridiculous! It's only gonna harm the students!

Reply

Lou Rainaldi Jr.

2:25 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

@CHM totally agree , I would never want to cut back on nurses or social workers. I like having one nurse at each school and feel we need the social workers.

Reply

Common Sense

3:20 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Some interesting comments by everyone. I think that the school district needs to think outside the box a little bit and try and save money without cutting programs and people that support the students within the district. The 4 day work week during the summer is a great idea. Many buisness's do this as a way to cut costs and doing this during the summer is a way of looking outside of the box and saving the district money during a time when the expectations get bigger while the budget gets smaller.

Reply

FF19

4:18 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

I agree the four door work week, advertising on school buses is a good idea. School nurses should not be cut as the district is opening itself to liability concerns by allowing office staff to "give students bandaids." Programs and activities should not be cut. However, they should be put on pay as you go or pay as use basis. As far as eliminating hardships for low income students to participate, I don't agree with as it is used as a crutch or excuse. If a student wants to participate, their families can use some initiative to raise funds for it by selling candy bars, magazines, hoagies etc.. That way programs that are not used will weed or cut themselves out.

Reply

Belle

6:03 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

It is crazy to cut social workers and nurses! Especially social workers. Our students need some sort of safe haven and that is where social workers and guidance counselors are highly valuable!

Reply

Belle

6:05 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

At the school I work at with 450 kids, we have a nurse once a week. Our secretaries take over when she is not present. No issues at this year!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jill

9:53 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

No issues, yet! All it takes is one child to get severely hurt or ill. Secretariesare just that, secretaries. They have no training to take care of kids who need meds etc. it is a sad day for BW School District if they look past ridding nurses from the district. They built the fancy new high school and now they have to scramble to make budget, even if it is at the cost of the students health, safety, and well being.

Comment_arrow

chris

11:12 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

Belle You must work at private school where there are no major health issues like allergies, asthma or diabetes. Our secreteries have enough to do without adding nursing duties to their job description. It's probably not in theier contract either to be a nurse. Would you want your secretary to give your child a breathing treatment or a shot?

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

5:57 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012

When the nurse is at lunch or sick, the secretaries take over. All of the school staff should be trained to handle emergencies. What happens if a child has a seizure in a class, the nurse isn't there till they go get them. Most of our school secretaries are mothers and i'm sure they all know how to handle an emergency.

Mary

11:31 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012

I agree with Cathy - merging with Brentwood School District and Borough would be catastrophic. Both the school district and borough are in financial ruins and would be another burden for us to carry. As for the free lunches, breakfasts, etc. my husband was laid off for nearly two years and we never applied for reduced or free meals for our three children, we paid our fair share for their lunches as everyone should. This program should not exist. Make do like we did, if you can't afford to buy lunch - then pack! If you live in a $350,000 home and lost your job, I am sure you are still surviving and your kids have I-phones that you are paying a monthly service fee for - so get rid of the I-phone and pay up for lunch. Stop taking advantage. If the program did not exist people would find a way to pay. As for Pay to Play - fundraise to pay the district back for equipment and bus rides. It should be mandatory!

Reply

Jean Smith

12:17 am on Friday, April 27, 2012

There are other school districts around that do not bus kids to school, the kids either walk to school or parents drive them to and from school. Also we have buses going to and from the schools with only one child on it. Why can't the school district put more than one child on a bus instead of sending out 10 or more buses, vans, etc with only once child on there.

Reply

CHM

8:08 am on Friday, April 27, 2012

I know Mt Lebonon doesn't have buses. Could you imagine the chaos at or elementary schools if parents have to drive their children and there were no buses? It would be a nightmare. Especially with the parents that cant just give their child a kiss and let the child get out of the car. I always get stuck behind the parent that opens the door for the child, looks for their bookbag in the car, gives them a hug, then talks to them for awhile, then walks them to the curb, waves goodbye and finally gets back in their car. Now imagine that with over 700 kids! And the school only allows about 15 minutes that they will open the doors in the morning. As far as 1 child on a bus??? I've never seen that. The bus my child rides on is overcrowded and that is why I choose to drive my child both ways!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

2:05 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

There is a small bus that stops off McAnnulty every day. Picks up one student then drives him to the high school and leaves him off. This is on the way for me to go to work, as I do drive my child to school. Then on the way we see another small bus picking up another student close to Whitehall Pool, (sorry I didn't pay attention to the school street to find out the name) and also dropps this child off at the high school. Why couldn't the same bus drop off both these students at the high school. Makes no sense why we need 2 buses to drop just 2 students off. Mt Lebanon Students do walk to school every day and the school has a pattern for the students to be dropped off.

Michael Dobs

10:45 am on Friday, April 27, 2012

There are many buses and vans with few kids on them, It's mostly vans though. They are the kids that BW pays to send to private schools. I know Ryan Clark from the steelers kids get driven to a private school in Oakland. Let's say $10.00 an hour. 1.5 hours round trip, two times a day 180 times a year that would be $5,400. And they are not even attending a BW school. No the district pays for all the local catholic schools and plus many many more.
Now to my point of a merger. Brentwood is classed much like BW, working class and some 'under privileged'. Yes oh pick up some rif raf, but for every 'top person' you have in the two districts you are able to lose one, Head football coach. Lose one. Super attendant, lose one, head of building maintenance, theres is way two much duplication of services. Start combining the schools to a limited extent and you benefit from selling property. Put all of the Middle schoolers in Brentwood HS. You have a stadium, pool, larger library, ext. All sports teams improve from the improved talent pool. There is a larger compitention for jobs so teachers try harder.

Reply

Mary

1:43 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

It is wonderful to have a family like Ryan Clark's in the Baldwin District - I am sure what he is paying in taxes to the boro is enough to cover busing expenses for his children - if that is the case. As for the merger - again ,I say it would be disastrous! Our administrators have worked hard to get where they are - it would be foolish to merge with Brentwood and oust half the administration and take on their debt and "rif-raf", we would have to hire additional social workers and Deans of Students to handle the onslaught of incoming problems.

Reply

Jean Smith

2:14 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

Mary, I bet Ryan Clark doesn't pay more than $5,400 a year in taxes to have his children bused to Oakland. What happens when the kids go to different schools because they are in different grade levels. They will be sending 2 buses out to his house every day. Baldwin on a downward spiral. Opps they did do one thing, made a video to try to get people with school age students to move in here. They need to quit wasting money and start putting the money back into our kids educations. That is why we need school vouchers, so that we as parents can decide where we want our children to go to school, and not have to sell our homes in order to put them in better schools.

Reply

NB

2:26 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

Those who have all the answers do you go to the school board meetings? The budget meeting was an open to the public meeting.

Reply

NB

2:49 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

The district figured out a way to have playgrounds built, I am sure they could if they really put their heads to it they could work with other businesses and there has to be money out there. Just need to look for it. The administrators are highly educated, let's hope they put their all into our district. Even the parents in our district are very intelligent and if asked might have some good answers to the problems. But that's a problem we have to overcome is to have all those involved work together, and help to make our children have a great few years of schooling. Not sit back and let's see how they can fail attitude has to change. I don't have the answers, I am not the one that is in the schools and sees if the secretaries are really loaded down and can't handle the office by one secretary. Maybe some of the things they are doing need to be given back to the appropriate persons and have only one secretary in the office. Do we pay to have student teachers in the district, I don't know, get rid of them if we do. The phone system for the schools is a sad investment. Trying call the school, do you like getting a machine instead of a person. The DVD wasted funds. The board needs to think, think and think again before voting yes on expensive items. Hold off on the 600, 000 plus hillside upgrade. Let's help the district and fill their "suggestion box" found on the main page of the district website with your ideas to help the district.

Reply
Comment_arrow

chris

11:15 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

The money for the playground at McAnnulty came from a donation from a booster group at the high school, the McAnnulty and Whitehall PTO, and the Duquesne Light partnership program. The Baldwin Whitehall school district gave roughly less than $1000 for the playground. The administrators, staff and parents at McAnnulty felt that this playground was important enough for the students, so they found the money for the playground.

Michael Dobs

7:33 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

I did not know it was a state mandate, makes getting that cost cut ALOT harder.

Reply

Justine M.

3:18 am on Saturday, April 28, 2012

It just gets more and more sad with each passing day...now we are actually entertaining the thought of eliminating nurses. I mean why not? We have eliminated teachers with more than 10+ years experience to cut costs. The schools don't even provide paper copies of interims or report cards anymore to save money. I got 3 automated phone calls last year reminding me Kennywood tickets would be on sale the following day, yet no phone calls as reminders to log on to the website to look up my child's report card. I've lived in the Baldwin-Whitehall area my entire life. I chose to raise my children in this area because I thought they would be getting a good education in a nice community. Everything just keeps being taken away...from school nurses to streetlights. The only thing we will gain are higher taxes.

Reply

bd

7:55 am on Saturday, April 28, 2012

But this school district buses to religious schools past the mandated state 10 mile limit. Ask your local school directors why that is.

Reply

morell

2:05 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012

CM I think that eliminating a school nurse is not a good idea you want a nurse at the school at all times. By the time 911 is called it may be to late. All it takes is one child to need that nurse right then and there.

Reply

Janet

11:28 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012

I agree we need to keep a school nurse at each school. I'm not quite sure why so much fuss is being made about transportation. We are a big school district and our children need transportation. I'm not saying our district doesn't have some issues regarding transportation, but I do believe there is much more waste in administration jobs and renovations, upgrades etc. Again, we need to start at the top and work our way down on reviewing the wasted money! As far as advertising, why not use the big sign in front of the high school also for advertising. Let's not just go halfway on making our district look like mules

Reply

It just doesn't matter

11:46 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012

Maybe the question is how do we provide bus transportation? No sleight intended to the folks who run our transportation service, but most Districts in our area have switched to a 3rd Party company to provide services. The reason is likely cost savings with no service decline. Has it ever been considered or studied here? School districts should worry about educating the kids, not running a transportation company.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

2:35 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Studies have been done and it cost school districts more money in the long run. I can't find the link at the present time to show the results of a recent study which was conducted. Also, with a sub contractor, you would have any Tom, Dick, or Harry driving the kids, not to mention, the bus stops would be moved to all main roads. Parents think they have it bad now, talk to parents of school districts who went to sub contractors.

Janet

2:40 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012

I still don't understand how the comments from this article have now all gone to blaming the district transportation department for the budget. Read back in the minutes from the last few years and see all the unnecessary spending that has gone on because administration has felt the need to have the newest, latest and greatest toys, ex: the telephone system they had was better than the one they are currently using.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

11:13 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Janet - you are correct. It is not one problem like the busing to the door of the kids. It is mostly in the inflated salary and benefits of the teachers and administration. Also, this district built a high school too large for the present and future school population and we are paying for it in high debt repayments. It is also possible that past early retirements given to older teachers are now catching up with the district. That is only a short term fix and the cost is kicked down the road a bit. Many still on this school board have been kicking that can down the road for years, unwilling for political reasons to do the right thing for the taxpayers and cut costs to the bone. I see that the Upper St. Clair teachers' union gave concessions to their district even though they are not required to do that under their current, unexpired contract. That forward-thinking union and school board chose to renegotiate the contract resulting in almost $4 million in savings to the taxpayers. Do you think the B-W board and the the union would do that? Unlikely: just raise taxes.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-south/upper-st-clair-teachers-accept-concessions-632860/

Jean Smith

11:24 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012

We only need 3 schools in the Baldwin/Whitehall School District, one grade school, one middle school and one high school, yet Baldwin has 3 grade schools. If we would consolidate them all into one building we could save on taxes, utilities, paying for teachers, office staff, nurses, principals, janitors, busing. This district waste to much money and they need to cut spending.
I'm not sure why we need all the buses, growing up if we lived within a half mile of the school we had to walk to school and didn't get bused. What is wrong with having central locations to pick kids up and take them to school instead of picking students up in front of their homes and doing many bus stops on one street because the parents don't want the high school students walking to a central location to catch a bus.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

1:01 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Jean, I personally am not opposed to central locations, although there are many streets in our school district, which I would question the safety of children walking on to get to these central locations. People are too much in a hurry in society now a days. On my way to work, I see cars go through buses stop lights. I would be concerned if it were my childs bus stop. Also Jean, you seem to be the expert on how to solve all the district problems, so I look forward to seeing you run for a school board position.

Jon Wain

3:32 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

To think your child wants to play football and represent baldwin whitehall school district and have to pay to play is nutz..these poor kids already pay for thier spikes and helmets.THAT"S sad in itself. Not to mention they to have provide insurance so if they get hurt the district is free of any respondibilty.BULLSh!&% They can hire outside people to teach the outside people who come from distant lands to read write and survive the great american dream,,,,,, my american born children should play for nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

me

10:26 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

A school's job is for education, not sports.

Jean Smith

4:23 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Janet our buses run red lights and stop signs in Baldwin Whitehall every day also. It isn't all drivers but when your driving behind a bus and watch them go straight though a stop sign without stopping and the bus garage does nothing when you call. Even sent them a tap of a bus doing it and the bus driver is still driving kids to school.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

6:34 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Jean what is your issue with Baldwin Whitehall transportation department? The more you blog, the more it comes out you have a personal vendetta against that department. Again, you think our school district transportation department is so bad, pay attention about sub contractors. And if you think you aren't being heard by our bus garage managers, you would get less satisfaction from the sub contractor. I'm sure you are perfect and make no mistakes, I really would like you to come clean on your issue with that department. Our school district has so many issues yet you focus on a department that knows they are seen in the public eye unlike the other departments. Maybe you should be running the transportation department, oh hell, go for the superintendent job since your perfect and the expert on everything

chris

8:11 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

@jean. What school do you think is big enough to hold all elementary students? We either would need to build another school building or add on to one. How does that save money? Great idea

Reply

Billee

8:35 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Did someone say B.W. suggestion box? I think the idea is good however not open with clarity... Does anyone know who exactly reads these suggestions from the residents in the suggestion box? Does anyone exchange and or water and weed the ideas that were left in the box? Would there be anyway to disclose the suggestions in the box to the public? Disclosure of public suggestions helps people learn from one another. If we can't use the technology of the Patch in good taste how are we as a district going to move forward and promote blended online learning for our children in Baldwin Whitehall? Can anyone say good example? I say you take the good with the bad because nothing is perfect. Besides the Patch tries its best to monitor the web site for proper use of terms. If our seeds of ideas can't be used and exchanged for growth from the district box for legal reasons I understand. In this case I would rather plant them in the Patch with my fellow B.W. community members than in the B.W. suggestion box. I will search for the facts only and look through the negative on the Patch to see the positive to make good at the end of our day. I tell our children this all the time and we have to remind ourselves of this as adults each and every time we walk out the door. Some days easier said than done.

Reply

Jean Smith

9:31 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Sometimes you have to build to save money. We need to get all the grade school kids into one building to save money, this was brought up way before they did the renovation on the high school, but our administrators and school board wanted to waste the money in fixing up the high school for a school that were not going to fill with students. Having 3 building to heat, electric, teachers, nurses, cafeteria staff, and all the other people that are needed to run all 3 buildings is a waste of money. To put all the money into just one school would save the district money. Other districts had to build to save money on staff and they are doing better when they cut wasted staff.

The kids that live in Baldwin Township spend at least 45 minutes to an hour on the bus. So what would be wrong with other students being on buses that long. Ask any parent that has kids over there and find out how long their kids are stuck on buses. It was horrible when they were doing construction on 88 and it is going to be worse for them when they start on 88 and 51 intersection.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

10:28 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

The district is saying they already don't have enough money for the budget , yet you want them to build another school so they can combine. One it would take a few years and two why would they keep spending money they don't have? Jean, you sure you're not a board member already???

chris

10:10 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

Where do you suggest they build this building?

Reply

Jean Smith

11:36 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012

They could always add on to one of the 3 grade schools, add another floor, but back when it was suggested at board meeting about doing this, our school board was to worried about making a bigger high school and wasting money there. They should of gotten rid of the school board back then before they redid it.

Reply

Michael Dobs

8:19 am on Monday, April 30, 2012

The old high school was much to small. It's halls were dangerous at passing periods due to how cramped they were. It's walls, floors and ceilings were falling apart. It needed a major redo. Adding floors to building is not only finically impractable it's also from an engineering point impracticable. Plus you would not save on heating(bigger space) you would not have room for gym classes, art classes, music, ect. So you would have to add thoes individual spaces. You would not save on teachers( can't add more to already over crowded classroom) You would still have the same cost in electricity. Would need a bigger cafeteria and kitchen to handle the extra kids.... You would need a building as big as the H.S. or back to my point Brentwood H.S. The school does have a "suggestion box" it's called "coffee with K" or somthing dumb like that. With the superattendant. Dont know if he would ever pass along ideas or just kill them right then and there but it's with a shot. Also next years "senior project" pull weeds inthe property and work on the hillside. Seniors will save the school 675,000.

Reply

Michael Dobs

8:19 am on Monday, April 30, 2012

I'm all in favor in raising my taxes, if they stop spending my money on painting the stadium, cleaning a hill side, a new auditorium when the olds just need some very minor updates, 2 softball fields and a 'butt load of money' and videos. Better schools = better home value which = better neighbors. Raise mine 2mil but I want to see academic and athletic results! I want to see alumni make it big and give back!

Reply

Jean Smith

11:16 am on Monday, April 30, 2012

In the 80's Baldwin's graduating classes were over 700 students in each class and there was enough room back then for all the students. In the 2000's we had to add on to the high school because it isn't big enough for less students.

Reply

Michael Dobs

1:00 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012

Yes Jean, 10, 11, 12. No 9the grade. They went to the Jr. High. Times have changed... It's not the 80s any more. The high school was deplorable, now it's not, thank you school board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

1:01 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

I know they had only 3 classes in the school and there was more kids in 3 grades than there was in the school district. Harrison Middle School was just for 9th graders back in the 70's and early 80's and they had 600+ students a year at the school.

The high school looks great but they didn't need to make the school that big, in the next 20 years, Baldwin will never see the students they had in the 70's and 80's. Only way that the school would get that many students again is for the school to improve on teaching our students, then should go talk to Mt Lebanon and find out what they are doing, on less money than what our school is taking in an year.

Sandra

1:13 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012

I think redoing the hillside is unnecessary, but it is a great idea Michael Dobs for the senior project to pull weeds. I think we absolutely need a nurse at every school, at all times. Like someone mentioned, this is not in the secretarie's contracts. Can you imagine having to check for head lice one day? I don't think it's something they signed up for when they took their jobs. As far as the bus/transportation system. I heard that it costs somewhere in the neighborhood about $15,000 of Baldwin school district money per child to send them to an alternative school. How about those students that don't attend a Baldwin school, or the school itself contribute to those costs?

Reply

Sandra

1:24 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012

Or we can try to get Baldwin/Whitehall families to volunteer to clean up the hilside. We can work together as a community. Make a weekend of it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary

4:11 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

How about the parents whose children are getting free and subsidized breakfasts and lunches put in some community time.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

11:59 am on Thursday, May 3, 2012

Mary, yes lets put the parents out there that get subsidized breakfasts and lunches out there to clean up the hillside and all the school properties. Along with those parents lets get all the parents who kids are in sports out there cause were wasting money on them too. Don't forget band parents, club parents and all the kids that take activity buses after school.

Jean Smith

5:54 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Pennsylvania Cyber School just picked up another 100 Baldwin/Whitehall Students for the 2012/2013 school year.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

7:57 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

They probably left because the 3rd gymnasium at the high school did not meet their needs. We need to spend more on the facilities because we all the know the school board believes in the build it and they will come philosphy. And, they did come, thanks in part to Catholic Charities.

Jean Smith

12:52 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

In 2010 Whitehall, put a stop to Catholic Charities moving people into Whitehall Place. Catholic Charities is now placing people elsewhere outside of our school district, which is good but isn't going to fix what the administrators and school board is doing to our schools.

Instead of the school having that 3rd gym, they should put tables and chairs in there to make sure that they have enough places for the kids to sit at lunch.

Reply

Michael Dobs

1:08 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

And the parents of thoes 100 students will be very depressed when their kids grow up and live with them till they at 40, since they will have no social skills but the time they spend with their computer. And how in the Heack and you bad mouth catholic charities for trying to give people a better life. I'm glad my kids go to school with multiple races, religions, ect. I hope you teach your kids your same social skills while you home school them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

6:55 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012

Michael not all charter school students sit at home behind a computer. There are charter schools out there, an alternative to send our children to and to get a better education.

bd

1:13 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Jean Smith - Please indentify your source for the claim that, "In 2010 Whitehall, put a stop to Catholic Charities moving people into Whitehall Place." I do not remember reading that. I also assume the ACLU would have weighed in on that one. If Catholic Charities is no longer placing people into Whitehall Place, it is because it no longer fits their clients. Having no bus service or reduced bus service might have deterred them from placing people there. I cannot believe Whitehall council or the school board took any action for fear of legal problems. Source, please.

Reply

Jean Smith

4:08 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

BL, go do a search on the internet for the article, I had no problem finding it last night on the net. BTW they do have bus service still up though Whitehall Place, you can look on Port Authority Bus Schedules to see that they do.

Maybe why they quit placing people up here as they did in Leland park is because they dropped on the number of people that they take Section 8 for. There is a way to get around everything and not get in trouble with the ACLU and NAACP, don't forget them because they stand up for the immigrants too now.

Wasn't it said prior also this was the only place that Catholic Charities puts immigrants and we have the highest amount of them in the state, which isn't true cause those articles were from years gone by.

Reply

bd

4:34 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Jean - On the contrary, I found articles from February and December of last year showing that Whitehall Place is a center for refugees and immigrants. Of the 1200 units, half of them are occupied by immigrants. South Hills Interfaith Ministries helps with counseling and receives a grant from Teresa Heinz to do so. It even mentions in this article that they have a special relationship with the borough manager of Whitehall. I did not find any article about Whitehall Place no longer open to subsidized housing. See,
http://baldwin-whitehall.patch.com/articles/baldwin-whitehall-a-refuge-for-many-nations


http://baldwin-whitehall.patch.com/articles/baldwin-whitehall-a-refuge-for-many-nations

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

5:26 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

I want to thank you for the facts also BD. Also where did Jean get the info regarding the Cyber School picking up another 100 BW students? Jean seems to give alot of miss information. I guess she's so busy stalking our district buses so she can tape them going through stop signs, trying to get our drivers fired.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

6:25 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

bd per a call to Whitehall Place, they don't accept Section 8 and of the 1200 units, that is incorrect that half of them are occupied by immigrants.

Jean Smith

7:21 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

http://www.mtlsd.org/district/budget/stuff/2012.13_proposed_budget_4.16.12.pdf

This is a copy of Mt Lebanon's Budget and the district in 2011-2012 spent Per Pupil Cost $             14,791 not the $11,520 that you stated before from education.com. That is more money per student then the 10,820 that you say Baldwin School spend on our students.

Reply

bd

8:11 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Jean - You wrote, "bd per a call to Whitehall Place, they don't accept Section 8 and
of the 1200 units, that is incorrect that half of them are occupied by immigrants." I refer you to an article on SHIM's website that states the occupancy figures. Here is the article you can read for yourself concerning 600 units occupied by immigrants or refugees, http://shim-center.org/programs/family-support/family-support-center/

Ask Whitehall Place if they accept subsidized housing. Section 8 is a specific type of subsidy. While they may not accept section 8, they may accept (and probably do) residents being helped with subsidies from groups like Catholic Charities. It is not Section 8 but it is subsidized housing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

12:02 pm on Thursday, May 3, 2012

Sorry BD, but Whitehall Place doesn't accept subsidies rent from Catholic Charities.

Janet

8:47 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Jean I'm sorry for your loss, but it sounds like it was an accident that could have happened to anyone who was driving behind her. You need to pray to God for strength to give you forgiveness for your bitterness toward the transportation department. NO ONE IS PERFECT, NOT EVEN YOU WHEN IT COMES TO DRIVING OR ANY ASPECT OF ONES LIFE. I'll pray for you too. Anyone who drives for a living will make mistakes, but they don't need someone stalking them waiting to report an error. May God bless you and bring peace within you.

Reply

Jean Smith

9:34 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

First of all it isn't stalking buses when your driving on the road and they run stop signs and red lights. I usually end up following one bus or another on the way to and from the high school every day and you see them run lights and stop signs. That is dangerous when they are full of students. I don't use a cell phone nor text while driving either. I keep my eyes on the road, especially when buses pull right out in front of you because a bus didn't stop at a stop sign or red light. Yes I will report them to this district or any other district. Kids lives are important and a bus driver should not be careless while behind the wheels of a bus.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

9:59 pm on Tuesday, May 1, 2012

I agree a bus driver should not be careless behind the wheel, but they are human and make mistakes like you and I. I don't believe that you see these drivers doing this everyday. You stated in a previous post " Even sent them a tap of a bus doing it and the bus driver is still driving kids to school." Someone would have to be sitting waiting and watching everyday for a driver to do this, that is stalking! And for you to think they would fire a driver because they went through a stop sign. I would hope it takes more than that for an employee to get fired. Again Jean, no one is perfect and if you think you are, shame on you. I happen to believe we have very caring and careful bus drivers. My children have liked the majority of their drivers over the years. To BW bus drivers, I think you do a fine job in keeping our children safe and I want to say thank you. I'm sure you don't get told this enough and deal with more people like Jean but I say thank you

Janet

12:15 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

If BW can't meet their budget, why did they create 2 new postions, Director of Programs, Darlene DeFilippo at a salary of $96,425 per year and Andrea Huffman to the position of director of curriculum for the entire district with an annual salary of $92,501? This is why we need to start with looking at administration first and working our way down on the cutting of spending.

Reply

Jean Smith

12:23 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Hopefully these to created positions will Director of Programs and Director of Curriculum will come up with a solution for giving our kids a better education and get back to teaching our students.

It was the people of Whitehall, Baldwin and Baldwin township that put them in office. To the ones that don't vote and complain, isn't it about time you do start to vote and make a difference for our kids to get a better education.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

5:25 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

You don't create positions like this when you can't afford a budget already. The board should be getting on administrations case to put out the extra effort, which they are being paid nicely already for to get our children getting the education they deserve. No more excuses for creating administration positions that we don't need

Jean Smith

7:39 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Janet I agree with you but since they already hired these people, i'm hoping that they can do the children justice and the teaching improves at the school.

Reply

Leave a comment