patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Baldwin-Whitehall School Tax Increase Expected to Be 1/2 Mill

The B-W School Board will vote June 13 on its final 2012-13 budget, which calls for a tax increase of 0.5 mills instead of the 1.08 mills considered in an earlier plan.

 

Baldwin-Whitehall School District residents braced for a tax increase of 1.08 mills for 2012-13 can breathe a bit easier.

The B-W School Board on Wednesday night moved away from that figure and toward a 0.5-mill increase instead. On June 13, the board will have a final vote on the proposed increase as part of its $60.5-million budget.

If approved, the owner of a property with an assessed value of $100,000 in Baldwin Borough, Whitehall Borough or Baldwin Township can expect to pay an additional $50 per year as the district's tax rate rises to 23.90 mills. (Click here to calculate your individual taxes.)

Property reassessments for 2013 will not affect Baldwin-Whitehall until its 2013-14 school year budget.

District Superintendent Dr. Lawrence C. Korchnak said that the move to a lesser millage increase is the result of one-time adjustments in spending for various programs during the coming school year. District officials also plan to utilize around $500,000 of the Baldwin-Whitehall fund balance—the budgetary surplus that the school board has been accumulating.

In theory, the district could hold its tax line by tapping further into that surplus, but rising costs—particularly with regard to employee contracts, health insurance and the state Public School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS)—make it prudent to maintain a healthy fund balance, according to some administrators and school board members.

Board President John B. Schmotzer pointed out that the district has not raised property taxes since a 1.50-mill increase in 2006-07. Since then, the rate has been lowered three times.

"We have saved the taxpayers $6.4 million in the past four years," Schmotzer said. "There comes a time when we're going to ask for a little back. This is necessary—very necessary—to maintain stability in this school district."

Schmotzer said that financial stability helps the district to maintain a superlative credit rating, which in turn, has helped it to save money on insurance when floating and refinancing bond issues.

Although Baldwin-Whitehall faces state funding cuts, it has not been forced to take measures similar to what has occurred in other Pennsylvania school districts.

"This budget does not reduce any education programs whatsoever," Schmotzer said.

Check back with the Baldwin-Whitehall Patch later on Thursday for more odds and ends from Wednesday night's school board meeting.

 ---

Follow the Baldwin-Whitehall Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Sign up for the daily Baldwin-Whitehall newsletter.

Related Topics: Baldwin Borough, Baldwin High School, Baldwin Township, Baldwin-Whitehall School Board, J.E. Harrison Middle School, Lawrence C. Korchnak, McAnnulty Elementary School, Public School Employees' Retirement System, W.R. Paynter Elementary School, and Whitehall Borough

bd

11:50 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Half a mill is unnecessary. If they did their jobs, the school board and the 2 superintendents could find cost cuts or shave the fat off the budget that Administration builds in. But they are lazy. Half a mill is a rounding error on a budget that is now so out-of-control.

Reply

ItisME

12:31 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I agree with bd definitely. They could start with getting rid of some of the administrators in the district that we DO NOT need and are useless. For instance, the Dean of Students at the high school? Really? What do we need a Dean of Students for? That was just a favor from the Schmotzers to the Wagners. And could they cut the bus service any to save money? Every day I see a lot of half full/half empty buses on their routes from the schools because there are so many parents who are driving their students back and forth. How dare they raise these taxes until they start to cut ALL of the waste in this district. There are families in this district who struggle to pay their bills and this doesn't help them while we have others who pay nothing and are costing the rest of us extra money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

12:58 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

ItisME - You mean you do not agree with the idiotic statement of John Schmotzer? He said it was time for you and all the other taxpayers to give a "little back." He acts like it was his money to begin with. He and his supporters on the board have got to go.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

5:01 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

ItisMe, Don't say anything about cutting buses or you will be attacked. I suggested that before and ML tore my head off.

Comment_arrow

cc

8:52 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

itisMe, I agree that there should be a cut in bus service as they are buses that goes to the schools with one or two children on them, and a lot of them are half empty. They could save money on combining buses so that each one is filled with students, and adding an extra 10 minutes on a bus isn't anything either. The students that live over in Baldwin Township can spend up to an hour on them ever day. Students within a quarter mile of the schools should be made to walk to school, as other districts do. The school needs to make cuts and put more money into educating our children and not waste it on empty buses or half full buses. But parents don't want that extra 10 minutes added on to the time students spend on the bus so the school district has to waste money on empty or half full buses.

Michael Dobs

12:56 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I know of 4 teachers that will be laid-off at the end of the year. 2 of which live in the district. I say we raise it 3/4 and keep their jobs. I'm not saying there is not fat to cut.. I just believe that it should not be at the students expense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

12:59 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Mr. dobs - The school board loves people like you.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

5:05 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Michael Dobs, I'm for them laying off one of Baldwin's Permanent subs that we have teaching at the high school.

Comment_arrow

AB

9:48 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

My sons attended the BW schools. They had some of the worst teachers over those years and, quite frankly, I was amazed how they could keep their jobs. Oh yeah, union security and tenure. We, the parents and TAXPAYERS, should not have to pay for that nor should we put up with that teaching our kids. There are some good teachers there but there are those who have no business being in the classroom. We should be able to weed them out.
And I also wonder why we need a Dean of Students? Cut the fat and DO NOT RAISE OUR TAXES. God Almighty, we are paying enough and with the new reassessments, etc. some of us will not be able to keep our homes.

Comment_arrow

JustMe

10:56 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

A high school dean of students is an education professional who is responsible for the academic progress of students. He promotes good attendance rates and ensures school safety and the prevention of campus violence. Additionally, he supports the teaching staff by developing classroom management programs, identifying students with attendance issues or disciplinary problems and addresses those issues with parents to create a positive outcome.

Wish the Dean of Students would also do disciplinary actions against some of the horrible teachers that we have in the high school. We have a lot of unnecessary staff in the school district, in administrative office and on the school board. When you make a complaint against a teacher it somehow falls back to your student(s), even when a few parents decide to go up to the school at the same time and make a complaint about a teacher.

Christina

3:27 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

After what the state did, 1/2 mill is not bad. And I don't believe anyone cannot afford it. It is only a $50 increase per year for a 100k house if I am understanding this correctly. For goodness sake that is a little over $4 per month.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

3:48 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Christina - that is not the point. When will they be satisfied? They will spend whatever you give them. The school board does not have it's fiscal house in order. And, who are you to say who can afford it? This entire issue of school tax on property has to change. There should be a way to tax people who use the school district more than those who do not or who have no kids in the system. One size or one tax does not fit all. And, what did the state do? The money that the school doistricts are crying about "losing" was the ridiculous federal stimulus money that was wasted by the feds and the districts to provide programs that were going to be in jeopardy when the federal money (our money) ran out. It was a political game in which the politicians figure that once money is provided for something, it is hard to get along without it. It was a political game that works since you are convinced that the new governor is at fault.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

5:16 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Christina I agree with you, we haven't had our school taxes raised in years and we are lucky that it is only going up a half a mil. Since 2008 gas prices have gone up, utilities gone up, price of food has gone up, yet we have to pay for that even though we don't like it. I budget my money because we never know when something is going to be raised. I learned a lot from Suzi Ormans TV show (not sure I should mention someones name on TV), but she is right in what she says.

Comment_arrow

AB

9:54 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Hey Christina ..... Who are you to say whether or not someone can or cannot afford it? ONLY a $50 increase? That $50 could go for something else for the family ... not in the coffers of a school district who needs to live within their means like the rest of us in this time where jobs are being lost, homes are being lost, etc. You may think $50 is very little but to the senior citizens who reside in the district and worked all their lives to pay the mortgage, taxes, etc. that $50 could be money they might need for their utility bills and/or prescriptions. I realize we all pay taxes but I hate the fact that we are throwing money to them when they could do this belt tightening and get rid of the waste.

Michael Dobs

4:03 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

With the thought of let the people who use it pay for it... When your house is robbed you will have to pay the police with the money the criminals just took off with. Or give your credit card number to 911 when your house is on fire before the trucks leave the station. How about when your assaulted you have to pay the district attorney to go to trial for you. But you(bd) were educated in a school so you should have to pay?

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

4:58 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Michael Dobs - Everyone makes use of those services and in fact a lot of people do not contribute to local VFDs. I am suggesting, for those of you who believe in "it takes a village," different levels of contributions. For those on fixed incomes and those without children, there would be a statewide average "contribution." For those with kids in the school district, there would be a higher level of contribution. Maybe if you patterned scholl district funding to the cost causers, people and school boards would think twice before offering programs that are spacely attended or going on building sprees.

Comment_arrow

bd

5:00 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

"School," not scholl, which was a typo before I get castigated for illiteracy.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

5:46 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

I would say that 90% of the people of Baldwin had kids, have kids or will have kids that will go to Baldwin Schools. Your kids might be out of school but why should you pay less in taxes. For the first 16 years I lived in Baldwin Township/Whitehall I had to pay taxes to educate other people kids. I didn't have kids till 8 years after I moved into our school district then mine went the first 8 years to Catholic School, but I did pay taxes to educate other peoples children. ML if that is the case of what your proposing then I want a refund for all the years that I had to support other peoples children to go to school and for bus service because my child had to walk to Catholic School because we were to close to the school for them to provide bus service.

Michael Dobs

11:13 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Well since I have never used social security, the FBI, police, welfare, EMS, the fire department, the library, I have 4-wheel Erie and don't care about snow or the condition of roads, I guess I can quit paying most of my taxes.

Everyone does use schools, it's our future! When you and I are old they will be incharge, so it's our job to make sure they have the right schooling and it's funded properly. I'm not saying it's spent properly now! But I do say it is very very under funded.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

5:53 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

ML what your proposing wouldn't work, as if that was the case, then I want money back for those "contribution" rate that I had to pay to educate other peoples students for the first 16 years that I lived in Baldwin School District. Would only be fair since you want to pay less in taxes now, but I had to pay to educate other peoples kids.

Jean Smith

6:00 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

ML, people don't want to buy now in Baldwin/Whitehall because of the school district. We had to make a video to try to lore people into the district. Baldwin School District is on a downward spiral. Ten years ago Baldwin/Whitehall was a great school district and there wasn't many homes up for sale, but look at web sites now for homes sales and see how many houses are up for sale in Baldwin, Baldwin Township and Whitehall. Maybe the School District can start making TV Commercials to advertise why they should move to BW School area, since the video that they made didn't work

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

7:47 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

This district has the best facilities around, an over-sized high school for a decreasing student population, and declining scholastic results. It definitely goes against the old saying that you get what you pay for. We all pay a lot for this mediocre public school system. It does not seem to matter how much money you throw at it. The results are always the same. We need to change the entire system. Finding a different way to fund this system would be a good start. Making boards and administrators accountable through a performance based school district funding system should be high on the state legislature's agenda.

Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

10:07 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

mr ml there is over 600 homes for sale in just the zip code of 15227 for Baldwin and Whitehall. Plus if you take Baldwin Township, Whitehall in both the 15227 and 15236 zip code then i'm sure that number would double maybe triple. At one time it was very hard to purchase a home in the Baldwin/Whitehall Zip Code. Our school board made a video to promote home sales in the Baldwin/Whitehall area to get people to purchase homes here. My Aunt and Uncles home off of Churchview has been up for sale for over 8 months now. My Uncle passed away and Aunt is in a nursing home (they can't rent out either) and people aren't buying in the area. The home was redone in the last 10 years and they are trying to get a fair market value for the home but they are not selling. Go look at real estate web pages pages and see how long houses are sitting on the market in the Baldwin/Whitehall area now, most homes use to sell within 60 days. Times have changed they are on the market now for long periods of time, aka video to promote home sales. . BTW mr ml, I own quite a few homes in the Baldwin/Whitehall area that I purchased, put money into them and rent them out. I just choose to buy homes over in Whitehall and in Baldwin Borough between Harrison Middle School and McAnnulty Elementary School. I would be more than willing also to pay 2 ml if I knew the money was being spent on Education and not wasted by the School Board and Administration of BWS.

Michael Dobs

12:31 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

The district does not the best facilities... Paynter is about 15 years past an update. The Elementry tech department is a joke. The grounds are horrible looking, when the grass looks like the neighbor you don't want next door we have a problem. The weight room is small and out dated... And that's after they took the wrestling teams gym and shrunk their square footage in 1/2. The lap tops in the high school used in classes are missing keys, because kids don't care and there are to many kids in a class for the teachers to notice. The district pays a large sum of money so the gymnastic team can practice off campus. Just because tinfoil is shinny and bright does not make it priceless.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

6:25 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

They spent all the money in and around the high school. Weight room, too small, wrestling team's gym, gymnastic team practicing off campus when we have what, at least 2 gyms? What you are asking for are things that a "pay for play" should be charged to reduce the expense for extracurricular activities.

cc

5:46 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Michael I so agree with your comment there. The new and improve High School on the first floor has many cracks showing already that need to be fixed already. They send the baseball team down to Wallace to practice since they don't have a baseball field up at the high school and they bus the kids from the high school down to Wallace during baseball season for practice and games. Have any of you took a tour of Bethel Park's new High School, now that is state of the art and real impressive.

Reply

Jean Smith

8:40 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

ML I most certainly paid for your children to go to school with my taxes unless you say they went to Catholic School, oh wait you said that the state funds them also.

"Public schools are funded through federal, state and local taxes and do not charge a tuition. Private schools, on the other hand, receive their funding through tuition, fundraising, and partial government funding. Private schools do not receive tax revenues, although all residents that live in the same school district pay the same amount in school taxes. This raises the question on whether this is fair or not and integrates the idea of vouchers. If money was attached to a child, schools must perform well or they will loose the money. In today’s world, public schools know that they will have the money allotted to them regardless of enrollment. In private schools, they do not have this luxury. Programs, resources, extra curricular activities and teacher salaries are all dependant on how they receive their funding."

The School Taxes that you pay goes to Baldwin/Whitehall School District and none of it goes to Catholic or Private Schools. Pennsylvania pays a small portion to have Title 1 Catholic Schools. None of my children used Title 1 in school so the state did not spend any money on my children to get a Catholic Education. Since it is illegal to use tax money on Catholic Schools then your taxes or did not go towards my children education as all of the money is giving to public schools.

Reply

Michael Dobs

8:44 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

BD... Let's do some simple math... $75 an athlete, 250 athletes. That's only 18,750. That pays for the head football coach and the double dipping as the weightroom coordinator. So unless you create and extra couple hundred athletes or make it $500 an athlete pay to play does not make up much.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

12:34 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

I agree with your math and your conclusion. What I do not agree with is what you are demanding from the taxpayers. These school districts are not college campuses and there is no reson for all the luxuries you want. Pay for play is only a start. The whole system has to be revamped. Maybe giving you a voucher to send your kids to Bethel Park for the amenities you mentioned is an answer. Amenties do not equate to educational competence. That should be the number one driver.

Jack O.

10:18 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Someone pointed out that this district "once" was a decent school district. It was years ago and that is why my spouse and I bought our home in the district. But, unfortunately, that has changed. The school district was brought way way down by several things; Green Meadows and Prospect Park. Sorry, I am not politically correct. There are some very nice people who live in and around those areas. But, unfortunately, there are a lot more who are NOT. I will not go into detail so as not to start a war on this thread but the district went down when these complexes became 99% Section 8.

Reply

JustMe

11:41 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Jack O
http://www.rentalhouses.com/Pennsylvania/Pittsburgh/172431
Leland Point does not accept Section 8 5492 Youngridge Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15236
Rent $450-$900
Deposit Please Call
Bed 1 - 3
Bath 1
Style Apartments
Available Date Please Call
Lease with buy option/contract No
Section 8 Acceptance No

Reply

JustMe

12:16 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Whitehall Place doesn't accept Section 8

These are a list of Apartments in the 15227 and 15236 Area that takes vouchers and section 8

BALDWIN TOWERS, CHURCHVIEW GARDEN APTS and GRAYSON COURT

Reply

Jean Smith

9:58 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Public schools are funded through federal, state and local taxes and do not charge a tuition. Private schools, on the other hand, receive their funding through tuition, fundraising, and partial government funding. Private schools do not receive tax revenues, although all residents that live in the same school district pay the same amount in school taxes. This raises the question on whether this is fair or not and integrates the idea of vouchers. If money was attached to a child, schools must perform well or they will loose the money. In today’s world, public schools know that they will have the money allotted to them regardless of enrollment. In private schools, they do not have this luxury. Programs, resources, extra curricular activities and teacher salaries are all dependant on how they receive their funding. The resources available between public and private schools vary as well. Many public schools have access to numerous technological resources while private schools may not. The number of computers available to students, and the use of technology in the classrooms are significantly different between both schools. Also, the text books that are available to students cause a problem. In public schools the books are constantly updated through government funding, while in private schools outdated books are common to be found in the classroom. If students are to be equally educated the resources available should be equal.

Reply

Jean Smith

10:02 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

U.S. public schools lag behind in basic mathematics, reading and science despite such huge expenses on public education. Even more surprising is the fact that Washington D.C. has one of the poorest rankings in the quality of education in the US. Are teacher resources and the study skills of students to be blamed? Are the funds being drained away on areas that are not fundamental to basic education, such as sports and extracurricular activities (although these activities are important and should be available to students as well)? Is it instead government failure and corruption that is causing such waste of educational funding in the US? These questions need to be answered when we as taxpayers fund our public educational systems.

Private schools, on the other hand, are typically funded by a combination of tuition, gifts, and endowments. These schools seem to continually provide an overall higher quality of education to our students, but at a cost that not many families can shoulder. If our public school system could find a way to provide everyone a high quality education with the funding provided, it could provide every student the opportunity to succeed despite the economic situation of his or her family.

Reply

JustMe

11:20 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

I graduated from Baldwin a few years ago and didn't realize what a mediocre school it really was until I got to college. Having graduated from Baldwin with highest honors despite not showing up for class very often and hardly doing any work, it was a pretty rude awakening to actually have to try in college. Baldwin's fine if you plan to join the military or go straight to work after graduation, but it's awful if college prep is what you're after. You can send your kids to Baldwin for an easy diploma, but don't expect them to be challenged along the way.

I graduated from Baldwin in 2009, and am now in College with a 3.8 gpa doing half as much work as I did at Baldwin. Although I had a bad experience with peers I got an amazing education. The writing experience I recieved at Baldwin more than prepared me for College. However, I would add I took all honors and AP classes in high school so I am sure core and academic don't prepare you nearly as much

I graduated from Baldwin a few years ago. Now that I am in college, I have noticed how mediocre Baldwin's education really was for me. At BHS, I slacked off all 4 years and graduated with higher than a 4.0 GPA. Now, I am attending a university with students who attended some of the best high schools in the country and I now feel below average. BWSD really needs to step up their game. At this point, I am for sure not living here post graduation because I do not want my kids attending this school.

Reply

JustMe

11:22 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

I am a parent who's daughter currently attends 10th grade at baldwin high school. My son, who is much older, said he loved the school district and is proud to be from baldwin. By the time my daughter got to middle school, she was completely unhappy with the school. My daughter's grades have dropped as she gets older due to horrible teachers. She comes home from school with tons of homework she does not know how to do. The school does not take care of her. I am very upset with the school. For how much my daughter complains, it's worth moving.

I graduated from baldwin in 2005 and couldn't be any prouder to say that I went there... I played football (from 2002-2004 state ranked every year!!!!) and while I did slide on a few things from being an athelete I felt everyone got treated pretty fairly.... word to the wise if you have a senior push for Mr.youngt for english he may have been the smartest and most devoted man I have ever met in my life. He challenges his students to be the best they can and will not accept any less. So many students and somewhat diverse but always an excellent time and with the new renovations it should be even better

Baldwin offers a variety of courses for students. The teachers are dedicated and caring.

Reply

JustMe

11:23 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

I just recently graduated in January and was very pleased throughtout my attending years. The teachers and staff were very qualified and helpful both in academics and general help. The safety within the school is great, the security guards do a great job. The fellow students are a little on the other side. You have your bad ones, your upper class ones, and then you really nice ones. But if you have children attending or will be attending, my comments about fellow classmates would be to just mind your own business and to stay with your group of friends. But other than the classmates, the safety, disipline, activites, and teacher quality are rated very, very high. I was taught and brought up right in the Baldwin- Whitehall School District, and I am happy to say that I graduated from here.

Reply

Michael Dobs

3:20 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

And just when the heck was Baldwin's football team rank in the WPIAL let alone the state. It's a good year if they are .500

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

9:20 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Michael maybe in that students mind they were good back when he was in school.

BaldwinMom

5:12 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

It was a position where the Schmotzers had to pay back the Wagners for some favor. So we are paying for that. Nice.

Reply

Concerned

7:17 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Dean of Students position is a joke.Who came up with this position? And why?It should be looked into. Did anyone else apply or was it just handed to someone?

Reply

Common Sense

8:09 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

The Dean of Student's position is not a joke. In fact this is a creative way for the BWSD to save money and have a focus on supporting the students and discipline.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bd

7:26 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

That is the job of Vice Principal. Save money? This school board? Now that IS a joke. The "Dean" position was created so that a person without state certification to be a vice principal could get an administrative position at high pay. It is a position that the school board majority uses to help their political friends or augment the pay of a sports coach.

Concerned

9:07 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Its a creative way way to keep a football coach on the payroll and helping out a political family.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

9:35 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Maybe the Dean of Students job is to make coffee and supply the donuts or bagels for the office The Principle takes care of running the school, vice principle is in charge of discipline, counselors take care of making sure that the students get the help they need for their classes, over see esl, and special ed.

Janet

8:24 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

Don't forget there is a Dean Of Students at Harrison too. What was the reason to hire him?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Smith

1:50 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

They need to put money into our kids education instead of making new positions up.

Comment_arrow

Common Sense

10:17 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Actually the Dean of Students position at the middle school was not created, it replaced one of the vice principal positions. I also believe that the Dean of Students postion was already there prior to the current person occupying the position.

Common Sense

8:50 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

Jean, I believe you mean PRINCIPAL, not principle and I am sure that you understand the difference.

Anyways, I believe that some people who make these comments on this website are very much uninformed and ignorant to how school districts set up their administrative teams. This is a model that was used in other school districts prior to BWSD using this setup and is a model that school districts are moving toward. I am sure that everyone has their reasoning and I am not certain exactly why they went this route, but one reason could be some stability in the administrative teams given the turnover rate that the BWSD has seen in the past decade or so.

Reply

Jean Smith

2:32 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

Common Sense sorry I spelled Principal wrong, I'll write it a hundred times for you. Where is this model school that Baldwin School District is coping after with a Dean of Students? Instead of a Dean of Students, we need to hire teachers that are capable of teaching and put the time in to teach our children.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Robert Edward Healy, III

8:38 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

A reminder that even masked profanity is not allowed on here. Thank you :)

Reply

Sasafras Jackson

4:50 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

If I understand all of these posts correctly, the consensus of the community is to see what the Dean of Students does when called to action and control the millage rates at the same time.

I could not agree more however I think that we need to remain in a joint front as we near community day because we are in this together.

Reply

cc

6:51 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Robert, I have also seen ml do the same to others toss rude comment at them. I though everyone on here is suppose to be able to voice their opinion on matters and not be attacked.

Reply

Steve

7:15 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

If you go onto to the school board agenda for tomorrow, it looks like there are major changes in jobs coming along with the millage rate going up. Change is good, but I hope too much change this quickly won't do more damage than good.

Reply

Leave a comment